What is logic? Or for that matter, the different logics. People may think differently, their logic not the same as others. But that's not what we're talking about now, right now we shall look into three "logics": logic, unlogic, and the rare inlogic.
You know logic and maaaaayyyyyyyyybe unlogic, which is supposed to be the "complete opposite" of logic. But inlogic is not the opposite of logic or unlogic, it is no logic. For if there is no logic, then there is no unlogic, but if there is no logic, then there exists inlogic.
As of now experts in philosophy (and random blabbering) have almost no clue what inlogic could include, any examples of inlogic, and the significance of inlogic. But if we have almost no clue, then that means that we have a little bit of a clue as to what it is, the examples and the significance. For example, take the universe. We don't really know how big the universe is, but outside of the universe there might exist inlogic for all matter is contained inside of the universe, and if there is nothing, then there is no logic which is actually inlogic. Now say that the universe will collapse and all life will be destroyed, then, if we could use our knowledge of inlogic and be able to harness it's probable powers, we could survive OUTSIDE of the universe and be able to keep humanity going, and not all die.
There are many frontiers that we have not explored yet, and many "logics" to discover, so bear wtih us as we explore THE DEEP FRONTIER. Or just incessantly babble random things.
~C
Saturday, September 26, 2009
Saturday, September 19, 2009
More On the Law of Possessives
More on The Law of Possessives
The Law of Possessives is seen in this example:
Cody and Brian go to Eric’s house to play Mario kart wii. Cody brings his wiimote and a cellphone. Brian brings a psp and a cellphone. The following describes what each person possesses.
Brian: Luck, PSP, Cellphone
Cody: High skill, Wiimote, Cellphone
Eric: Skill, House, Wii, Game, Everything inside house, Wiimote, Cellphone.
Cody has brought a Wiimote and Brian has brought a PSP. While PSP beats Wiimote in awesomeness, Wiimote is used in the actual game, and the PSP does not. Therefore, Wiimote beats PSP in possession.
Cody has high skill, and Eric has skill. Cody beats Eric in that regard.
Luck is an outside force and will be focused on in my next lecture/post.
Eric, Cody, and Brian all own cellphones, and though Eric’s phone beats Brian’s phone which beats Cody’s phone, they are not used in the game, so their possessive awesomeness is reduced to a third of its original.
Everything Eric owns besides the cellphone can relate to the game, from the couch Brian sits on to the pillows that Cody sit on to the TV screen itself, so Eric naturally has the highest possessive awesomeness.
Therefore, it is understood that unless an outside force exerts itself, Eric will win every race, and Cody will beat Brian in every race.
Next time: Outside forces that can cancel the Law of Possessives
The Law of Possessives is seen in this example:
Cody and Brian go to Eric’s house to play Mario kart wii. Cody brings his wiimote and a cellphone. Brian brings a psp and a cellphone. The following describes what each person possesses.
Brian: Luck, PSP, Cellphone
Cody: High skill, Wiimote, Cellphone
Eric: Skill, House, Wii, Game, Everything inside house, Wiimote, Cellphone.
Cody has brought a Wiimote and Brian has brought a PSP. While PSP beats Wiimote in awesomeness, Wiimote is used in the actual game, and the PSP does not. Therefore, Wiimote beats PSP in possession.
Cody has high skill, and Eric has skill. Cody beats Eric in that regard.
Luck is an outside force and will be focused on in my next lecture/post.
Eric, Cody, and Brian all own cellphones, and though Eric’s phone beats Brian’s phone which beats Cody’s phone, they are not used in the game, so their possessive awesomeness is reduced to a third of its original.
Everything Eric owns besides the cellphone can relate to the game, from the couch Brian sits on to the pillows that Cody sit on to the TV screen itself, so Eric naturally has the highest possessive awesomeness.
Therefore, it is understood that unless an outside force exerts itself, Eric will win every race, and Cody will beat Brian in every race.
Next time: Outside forces that can cancel the Law of Possessives
Friday, September 18, 2009
Introducing...Tongs!
Haha, okay. : |
Mister Chao has let me into this Blarghed information network known.
One of the reasons is because I was involved in the conception of Laws of Posessions (see second post) and the post about desire and ignorance driving all human nature (see third post) was born out of a conversation we had.
Probably the second reason is that alone, we stand about 75% chance of forgetting to update the bhlog. Together, the chance of us both forgetting is around 30%.
Third is because I asked him and he's a great friend like that.
Apparently I opened up a whole new dimmension of in/un/logic for this blog with my Taoist book of quotes, too.
First order of the day, I will invent a new word. See you later.
Miror
What if in the mirror there existed another world?
A world much like ours, with people just like us.
Only they were opposite in the rights and the lefts.
Neither side knows the other, so close and yet so far.
Seperated by a transparent wall.
Doing the same, and yet doing the opposite.
When we succeed, they succeed; when they fail, we fail.
Both thinking that the other is only them.
Bound by fate we are.
So that fate is the one who keeps our worlds united, and yet it is the same one who keeps them apart.
Fate, Mirrors, the wall known as ignorance.
A world much like ours, with people just like us.
Only they were opposite in the rights and the lefts.
Neither side knows the other, so close and yet so far.
Seperated by a transparent wall.
Doing the same, and yet doing the opposite.
When we succeed, they succeed; when they fail, we fail.
Both thinking that the other is only them.
Bound by fate we are.
So that fate is the one who keeps our worlds united, and yet it is the same one who keeps them apart.
Fate, Mirrors, the wall known as ignorance.
Saturday, August 29, 2009
Human Weakness
Everyone's probably heard of the seven sins, right? But are not the sins only desire and ignorance combined?
Desire is want, the attraction of physical and metaphysical objects and concepts. Ignorance is the capacity to learn, so subconsciously people try to learn to reduce ignorance by learning and isn't that basically curiosity?
Want and curiosity are both incorporated into sin, and are probably the most basic aspects of the seven sins. Like how greed is the desire to have something but the ignorance makes man want more to know more, and envy is the desire of things that others have while ignorance makes us want to know what it's like to have it, what it's like to be the other person. War is also caused by desire and ignorance; both sides want something, maybe the same or different thing(s), but they can only fight because they are too ignorant to see a peaceful solution. No one really knows a fool proof way for everyone to get what they want.
So are greed and ignorance the greatest enemy of mankind? Are humans forever destined to fight them? Will the people win? I really doubt it, but who knows?
Desire is want, the attraction of physical and metaphysical objects and concepts. Ignorance is the capacity to learn, so subconsciously people try to learn to reduce ignorance by learning and isn't that basically curiosity?
Want and curiosity are both incorporated into sin, and are probably the most basic aspects of the seven sins. Like how greed is the desire to have something but the ignorance makes man want more to know more, and envy is the desire of things that others have while ignorance makes us want to know what it's like to have it, what it's like to be the other person. War is also caused by desire and ignorance; both sides want something, maybe the same or different thing(s), but they can only fight because they are too ignorant to see a peaceful solution. No one really knows a fool proof way for everyone to get what they want.
So are greed and ignorance the greatest enemy of mankind? Are humans forever destined to fight them? Will the people win? I really doubt it, but who knows?
Wednesday, August 19, 2009
Murphy's Second Law?
In my many years, I have noticed a pattern regarding luck. The Law of Possesives, or as I'd like to call it, Murphy's Second Law. This law states that the luck of a person in an activity or game can be based on the quantity and awesomeness of the items they hold; they do not need to neccesarily own them, but have some claim on the item. Like in gambling, there are lucky dices and relics that some people like to have on them while playing a game, believing that item will bring them luck. Plushies also work, the cuter the better, and if you actually own an object that is neccesary to play the game or activity, then that will also boost your luck considerably.
So keep in mind: the more the merrier, and the objects have to be awesome and/or cute. If the item is not awesome and/or cute, then the item will do nothing for you but weigh you down. And also if the item is of distaste, then you will certainly have a hard time winning.
Luck is also based upon the person themselves, such as with negative or positive ions surrounding them, but THAT, I think, is another story for another time.
Use this knowledge with care, for with great power comes the great benefit of slacking off.
So keep in mind: the more the merrier, and the objects have to be awesome and/or cute. If the item is not awesome and/or cute, then the item will do nothing for you but weigh you down. And also if the item is of distaste, then you will certainly have a hard time winning.
Luck is also based upon the person themselves, such as with negative or positive ions surrounding them, but THAT, I think, is another story for another time.
Use this knowledge with care, for with great power comes the great benefit of slacking off.
Friday, August 7, 2009
An introduction to Unlogic.
Unlogic is just another way to interpret logic, for if unlogic breaks every rule of logic, then that means it would follow a logical pattern. But if unlogic follows a logical pattern, then that wouldn't be unlogic anymore, so unlogic must follow logic in order to break logic. And that is how clothes are born.
Yes. Unlogic's basically a bunch of random ramblings that have only the singular purpose of confusing the listeners and readers. Some say it's stupid, some say it's preposterous, I say it either way. So anyways, if you haven't read the description, I'm not sure what this blog will be about. Oh well, we'll find out eventually. If you love it; read it and follow along. If you hate it; then go read some other blog or whatever. I think this blog is intended for those of open-mindedness and good humor, because I'll probably be questioning things that may be considered blasphemy in some religions or something. So until next time.
Yes. Unlogic's basically a bunch of random ramblings that have only the singular purpose of confusing the listeners and readers. Some say it's stupid, some say it's preposterous, I say it either way. So anyways, if you haven't read the description, I'm not sure what this blog will be about. Oh well, we'll find out eventually. If you love it; read it and follow along. If you hate it; then go read some other blog or whatever. I think this blog is intended for those of open-mindedness and good humor, because I'll probably be questioning things that may be considered blasphemy in some religions or something. So until next time.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
